How journos like to receive news (and it’s not through social media)

I went to a CIPR event in Bristol tonight which covered topics including issues management, PR in the third sector and (yes) the fragmentation of media and the audiences who consume it.

That’s a lot of ground to cover in less than two hours (although, in fairness, the event was badged as ‘a taste of public relations’). It was one of those sessions that can induce a feeling of unease about the range of tools there are to master, and how little one actually knows about any of them.

Continue reading “How journos like to receive news (and it’s not through social media)”

How (anti) social media can come back to bite you

I’ve just come across this research, courtesy of Mindflash, which looks at the things companies are finding out about their staff and prospective hires from the information placed on publicly available social media platforms.

There are a few warnings for prospective job hunters, who may be busy deleting damning photographs from their Facebook profiles if they have read the blog.

But there are some positives too which demonstrate how social media can boost people’s professional profile if used with a bit of common sense.

I’ve no doubt that the idea of employers trawling online personal profiles would be chilling for quite a few people.

Facebook, which is more of a network of friends than work associates, is different to professionally focused tools like LinkedIn – although both can be made private so that those who don’t know you can’t see what you are saying. 

For many users, Twitter tends to sit between these two platforms in the social v professional spectrum and is a much more public tool, as Joey Barton has found out recently.

Yesterday’s news of two men being sent to jail for four years for ‘inciting riots’ on Facebook is proof of how the misuse of social media can come back to bite people, in this case pretty swiftly.

Click on the graphic to the right if you want to expand it for more detail on the Mindflash research.

Twitter cases show PR may be better than legal action

It’s been a frenzied week for the media, which took navel gazing to new levels over the spectacular failure of lawyers to protect Ryan Giggs’ privacy.

They succeeded for a while in keeping their client’s name out of stories of his alleged affair. But, as pressure mounted and newspapers’ displeasure at the fact that it was open season on Twitter grew, it was only a matter of time before traditional media named him.

By the time John Hemming used parliamentary privilege to publicly name Giggs, the story turned from a fairly trivial one to an issue of constitutional significance and no amount of legal heavy-handedness was going to suppress it.

When the Sunday Herald broke ranks last weekend and named Giggs, public appetite for the story was huge. It resulted in a record number of hits on its website, despite the fact that item only appeared in print.

Continue reading “Twitter cases show PR may be better than legal action”

‘Andy Gray-gate’ highlights slack media practice

Andy Gray’s sacking today after another of his puerile outbursts (this time to colleague Charlotte Jackson last month, above) teaches him a harsh lesson.

Someone with his experience should know that ‘private’ comments are still fair game if someone within earshot finds them offensive enough to share with the media.

In fact, if you utter them in a room full of people, it isn’t very ‘private’ at all, and therefore best kept to yourself.

Continue reading “‘Andy Gray-gate’ highlights slack media practice”

Twitter ‘terrorist’ latest in list of casualties

Twitter terrorist Paul Chambers post

Doncaster Crown Court dealt our a very harsh lesson to frustrated flyer Paul Chambers today: if you don’t want your words to get you into trouble, don’t let them come out of your mouth (or Twitter feed). 

Sure, joking on Twitter that he would blow Donny airport ‘sky high’ if he couldn’t fly to Ireland was dim. But criminal?

It’s merely the latest in a long line of regretful tweets posted in the heat of the moment without thinking, just like in the ‘real world’ where people say stupid things all the time.

There is a growing chorus of incredulity in the Twitterverse tonight at the judge’s decision to throw out Chambers’ appeal against his conviction for the ‘obviously menacing’ tweet. The hashtag #twitterjoketrial could trend tonight as a result.

If only he had thought twice before hitting the tweet button though. He’s not the only tweeter to hit the headlines for glib remarks today either.